linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: core: return ENODEV if ioctl is unknown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ2mC5V6PdphmtmtQKHZwPfc7mVgZ-FH3io2ihB8foA4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 9 May 2021 17:29:10 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: core: return ENODEV if ioctl is unknown

On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 May 2021 20:21:08 +0200
> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:

> > Unless you really like to base your work on Gregs tree for
> > some reason or other, that is.
>
> Definitely appreciate Greg's help (and patience), but no
> particularly strong reason to waste his time dealing with my
> mess ups. Hopefully they'll reduce now IIO trees are going directly
> into linux-next though.

I'd suggest to move to sending pulls to Torvalds directly
for IIO to cut the intermediary staging tree step, since
now the subsystem is pretty large and see a bunch of
frequent fixes that need an express path to Torvalds.

Pushing through Greg per se isn't really the problem,
I think the problem is that IIO is going through the
staging tree which (I guess) isn't a high priority activity
and not expected to carry any serious critical fixes and
I guess this can cause lags.

Maybe Greg has some other branch to take in IIO
fixes and for-next but I don't really see the point.

The IIO left in the staging tree is just regular staging
business at this point, the main IIO is much more
important.

Linus 2: would pulling the IIO tree directly work for
you if Jonathan makes up his mind in favor for that?

Yours,
Linus Walleij