linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 289/384] virtiofs: fix memory leak in virtio_fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210510102024.335554759@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 12:21:18 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 289/384] virtiofs: fix memory leak in virtio_fs_probe()

From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>

commit c79c5e0178922a9e092ec8fed026750f39dcaef4 upstream.

When accidentally passing twice the same tag to qemu, kmemleak ended up
reporting a memory leak in virtiofs.  Also, looking at the log I saw the
following error (that's when I realised the duplicated tag):

  virtiofs: probe of virtio5 failed with error -17

Here's the kmemleak log for reference:

unreferenced object 0xffff888103d47800 (size 1024):
  comm "systemd-udevd", pid 118, jiffies 4294893780 (age 18.340s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00  .....N..........
    ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 80 90 02 a0 ff ff ff ff  ................
  backtrace:
    [<000000000ebb87c1>] virtio_fs_probe+0x171/0x7ae [virtiofs]
    [<00000000f8aca419>] virtio_dev_probe+0x15f/0x210
    [<000000004d6baf3c>] really_probe+0xea/0x430
    [<00000000a6ceeac8>] device_driver_attach+0xa8/0xb0
    [<00000000196f47a7>] __driver_attach+0x98/0x140
    [<000000000b20601d>] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0
    [<00000000399c7b7f>] bus_add_driver+0x11b/0x1f0
    [<0000000032b09ba7>] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
    [<00000000cdd55998>] 0xffffffffa002c013
    [<000000000ea196a2>] do_one_initcall+0x64/0x2e0
    [<0000000008f727ce>] do_init_module+0x5c/0x260
    [<000000003cdedab6>] __do_sys_finit_module+0xb5/0x120
    [<00000000ad2f48c6>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
    [<00000000809526b5>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
Fixes: a62a8ef9d97d ("virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem")
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -896,6 +896,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_probe(struct virtio
 out_vqs:
 	vdev->config->reset(vdev);
 	virtio_fs_cleanup_vqs(vdev, fs);
+	kfree(fs->vqs);
 
 out:
 	vdev->priv = NULL;