[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210510102026.695307574@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 12:22:31 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+be51ca5a4d97f017cd50@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Palash Oswal <hello@...alpalash.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 362/384] io_uring: Check current->io_uring in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll
From: Palash Oswal <hello@...alpalash.com>
commit 6d042ffb598ed83e7d5623cc961d249def5b9829 upstream.
syzkaller identified KASAN: null-ptr-deref Write in
io_uring_cancel_sqpoll.
io_uring_cancel_sqpoll is called by io_sq_thread before calling
io_uring_alloc_task_context. This leads to current->io_uring being NULL.
io_uring_cancel_sqpoll should not have to deal with threads where
current->io_uring is NULL.
In order to cast a wider safety net, perform input sanitisation directly
in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll and return for NULL value of current->io_uring.
This is safe since if current->io_uring isn't set, then there's no way
for the task to have submitted any requests.
Reported-by: syzbot+be51ca5a4d97f017cd50@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palash Oswal <hello@...alpalash.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210427125148.21816-1-hello@oswalpalash.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -9005,6 +9005,8 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_sqpoll(struc
s64 inflight;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ if (!current->io_uring)
+ return;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!sqd || sqd->thread != current);
atomic_inc(&tctx->in_idle);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists