lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 14:16:08 +0300
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@...s.arm.com>,
        "James \(Qian\) Wang" <james.qian.wang@....com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Mihail Atanassov <mihail.atanassov@....com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 44/53] docs: gpu: avoid using UTF-8 chars

On Mon, 10 May 2021, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> While UTF-8 characters can be used at the Linux documentation,
> the best is to use them only when ASCII doesn't offer a good replacement.
> So, replace the occurences of the following UTF-8 characters:
>
> 	- U+2019 ('’'): RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>


> ---
>  Documentation/gpu/i915.rst       | 2 +-
>  Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst b/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst
> index 486c720f3890..2cbf54460b48 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst
> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ Locking Guidelines
>  	  real bad.
>  
>  #. Do not nest different lru/memory manager locks within each other.
> -   Take them in turn to update memory allocations, relying on the object’s
> +   Take them in turn to update memory allocations, relying on the object's
>     dma_resv ww_mutex to serialize against other operations.
>  
>  #. The suggestion for lru/memory managers locks is that they are small
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst b/Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst
> index eb693c857e2d..c2067678e92c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ the control-abilites of device.
>  
>  We have &komeda_dev, &komeda_pipeline, &komeda_component. Now fill devices with
>  pipelines. Since komeda is not for D71 only but also intended for later products,
> -of course we’d better share as much as possible between different products. To
> +of course we'd better share as much as possible between different products. To
>  achieve this, split the komeda device into two layers: CORE and CHIP.
>  
>  -   CORE: for common features and capabilities handling.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ