[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJkZr7yIVVW1Fw+o@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 13:31:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: remove some checks for always present Xen
features
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 22.04.21 17:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > Some features of Xen can be assumed to be always present, so add a
> > central check to verify this being true and remove the other checks.
> >
> > Juergen Gross (3):
> > xen: check required Xen features
> > xen: assume XENFEAT_mmu_pt_update_preserve_ad being set for pv guests
> > xen: assume XENFEAT_gnttab_map_avail_bits being set for pv guests
> >
> > arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 12 ++----------
> > arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/xen/features.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 36 ++----------------------------------
> > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Could I please get some feedback on this series?
I'm obviously in favour, but given I'm not an actual Xen user that might
not be worth much, still:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists