linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i8RnOg2HgEmLze7d3rYvofVDFDQORMOigNc0vEhLW16Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 14:13:49 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Shujun Wang <wsj20369@....com>
Cc:     "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources unconditionally"

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:37 AM Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Shujun,
>
> I'm experiencing similar problem, and it should be a BIOS problem,

Right, and I confused things.  Sorry about that.

If commit 7e4fdeafa61f2b653f ("ACPI: power: Turn off unused power
resources unconditionally") causes problems to happen, this means that
the platform firmware implementation doesn't follow the ACPI
specification.

> which can be fixed by a customized DSDT.
> Can you please attach the full acpidump output on this machine? I just want to make sure if it is the same problem.

Yes, please.

Rui, can you create a BZ for this please and can you both attach
dmidecode output from the affected systems?

I don't want to revert this commit completely, so the default behavior
is spec-compliant, but there can be a DMI-based blacklist for systems
having problems with it.

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@....com>
> > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 8:42 PM
> > To: rjw@...ysocki.net; lenb@...nel.org; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@....com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI: power: Turn off unused power resources
> > unconditionally"
> >
> > This reverts commit 7e4fdeafa61f2b653fcf9678f09935e55756aed2.
> > It may cause some NVMe device probes to fail, and the system may get stuck
> > when using an NVMe device as the root filesystem.
> >
> > In the function nvme_pci_enable(struct nvme_dev *dev), as shown below,
> > readl(NVME_REG_CSTS) always returns -1 with the commit, which results in
> > the probe failed.
> >
> >   if (readl(dev->bar + NVME_REG_CSTS) == -1) {
> >       result = -ENODEV;
> >       goto disable;
> >   }
> >
> > dmesg:
> >   [    1.106280] nvme 0000:04:00.0: platform quirk: setting simple suspend
> >   [    1.109111] nvme nvme0: pci function 0000:04:00.0
> >   [    1.113066] nvme 0000:04:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> >   [    1.121040] nvme nvme0: Removing after probe failure status: -19
> >
> > lspci:
> >   Non-Volatile memory controller: KIOXIA Corporation Device 0001
> >
> > device uevent:
> >   DRIVER=nvme
> >   PCI_CLASS=10802
> >   PCI_ID=1E0F:0001
> >   PCI_SUBSYS_ID=1E0F:0001
> >   PCI_SLOT_NAME=0000:04:00.0
> >   MODALIAS=pci:v00001E0Fd00000001sv00001E0Fsd00000001bc01sc08i02
> >
> > This patch was tested in Lenovo Thinkpad X1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shujun Wang <wsj20369@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/power.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c index
> > 56102eaaa2da..8bf10abeb2e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > @@ -1004,9 +1004,18 @@ void
> > acpi_turn_off_unused_power_resources(void)
> >       mutex_lock(&power_resource_list_lock);
> >
> >       list_for_each_entry_reverse(resource, &acpi_power_resource_list,
> > list_node) {
> > +             int result, state;
> > +
> >               mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
> >
> > -             if (!resource->ref_count) {
> > +             result = acpi_power_get_state(resource->device.handle,
> > &state);
> > +             if (result) {
> > +                     mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (state == ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON
> > +                 && !resource->ref_count) {
> >                       dev_info(&resource->device.dev, "Turning OFF\n");
> >                       __acpi_power_off(resource);
> >               }
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>