[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df6b4567-030c-a480-c5a6-fe579830e8c0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:16:16 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
mjpeg-users@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/53] Get rid of UTF-8 chars that can be mapped as ASCII
On 10/05/2021 12:55, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The main point on this series is to replace just the occurrences
> where ASCII represents the symbol equally well
> - U+2014 ('—'): EM DASH
Em dash is not the same thing as hyphen-minus, and the latter does not
serve 'equally well'. People use em dashes because — even in
monospace fonts — they make text easier to read and comprehend, when
used correctly.
I accept that some of the other distinctions — like en dashes — are
needlessly pedantic (though I don't doubt there is someone out there
who will gladly defend them with the same fervour with which I argue
for the em dash) and I wouldn't take the trouble to use them myself;
but I think there is a reasonable assumption that when someone goes
to the effort of using a Unicode punctuation mark that is semantic
(rather than merely typographical), they probably had a reason for
doing so.
> - U+2018 ('‘'): LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
> - U+2019 ('’'): RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
> - U+201c ('“'): LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK
> - U+201d ('”'): RIGHT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK
(These are purely typographic, I have no problem with dumping them.)
> - U+00d7 ('×'): MULTIPLICATION SIGN
Presumably this is appearing in mathematical formulae, in which case
changing it to 'x' loses semantic information.
> Using the above symbols will just trick tools like grep for no good
> reason.
NBSP, sure. That one's probably an artefact of some document format
conversion somewhere along the line, anyway.
But what kinds of things with × or — in are going to be grept for?
If there are em dashes lying around that semantically _should_ be
hyphen-minus (one of your patches I've seen, for instance, fixes an
*en* dash moonlighting as the option character in an `ethtool`
command line), then sure, convert them.
But any time someone is using a Unicode character to *express
semantics*, even if you happen to think the semantic distinction
involved is a pedantic or unimportant one, I think you need an
explicit grep case to justify ASCIIfying it.
-ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists