[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edf3ff4d-8bd7-17cf-0d7c-96b4f704dddd@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 10:21:41 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] extcon: extcon-max8997: Fix IRQ freeing at error path
On 10/05/2021 04:12, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> If reading MAX8997_MUIC_REG_STATUS1 fails at probe the driver exits
> without freeing the requested IRQs.
The driver frees IRQ on probe failure, so maybe you meant missing IRQ
mapping dispose?
>
> Simplify driver and fix the IRQ problem by switching to use the
> resource managed IRQ requesting and resource managed work-queue
> initialization.
>
> Fixes: 3e34c8198960 ("extcon: max8997: Avoid forcing UART path on drive probe")
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> ---
>
> Please note that the change is compile-tested only. All proper testing is
> highly appreciated.
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c | 45 +++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c
> index e1408075ef7d..bbc592823570 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> // Copyright (C) 2012 Samsung Electronics
> // Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@...sung.com>
>
> +#include <linux/devm-helpers.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> @@ -650,27 +651,30 @@ static int max8997_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mutex_init(&info->mutex);
>
> INIT_WORK(&info->irq_work, max8997_muic_irq_work);
> + ret = devm_work_autocancel(&pdev->dev, &info->irq_work,
> + max8997_muic_irq_work);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(muic_irqs); i++) {
> struct max8997_muic_irq *muic_irq = &muic_irqs[i];
> unsigned int virq = 0;
>
> virq = irq_create_mapping(max8997->irq_domain, muic_irq->irq);
> - if (!virq) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto err_irq;
> - }
> + if (!virq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> muic_irq->virq = virq;
>
> - ret = request_threaded_irq(virq, NULL,
> - max8997_muic_irq_handler,
> - IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> - muic_irq->name, info);
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, virq, NULL,
> + max8997_muic_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> + muic_irq->name, info);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "failed: irq request (IRQ: %d, error :%d)\n",
> muic_irq->irq, ret);
> - goto err_irq;
> + return ret;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -678,14 +682,13 @@ static int max8997_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> info->edev = devm_extcon_dev_allocate(&pdev->dev, max8997_extcon_cable);
> if (IS_ERR(info->edev)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate memory for extcon\n");
> - ret = PTR_ERR(info->edev);
> - goto err_irq;
> + return PTR_ERR(info->edev);
> }
>
> ret = devm_extcon_dev_register(&pdev->dev, info->edev);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register extcon device\n");
> - goto err_irq;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> if (pdata && pdata->muic_pdata) {
> @@ -756,23 +759,6 @@ static int max8997_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> delay_jiffies);
>
> return 0;
> -
> -err_irq:
> - while (--i >= 0)
> - free_irq(muic_irqs[i].virq, info);
Here it will unwind what was done.
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists