[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJlB7XutrKJ0vq6n@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 19:53:41 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: fsl-qdma: check dma_set_mask return value
On 26-04-21, 16:59, Robin Gong wrote:
> For fix below warning reported by static code analysis tool like Coverity
> from Synopsys:
>
> 'CID 12285639 (#1 of 2): Unchecked return value (CHECKED_RETURN)'
This should be:
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 12285639 ("Unchecked return value")
I have fixed that up and applied
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/fsl-qdma.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-qdma.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-qdma.c
> index ed2ab46..045ead4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-qdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-qdma.c
> @@ -1235,7 +1235,11 @@ static int fsl_qdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> fsl_qdma->dma_dev.device_synchronize = fsl_qdma_synchronize;
> fsl_qdma->dma_dev.device_terminate_all = fsl_qdma_terminate_all;
>
> - dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
> + ret = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_set_mask failure.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, fsl_qdma);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists