lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 09:54:58 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "liaochang \(A\)" <liaochang1@...wei.com>,
        xuyihang <xuyihang@...wei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, minlei@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Virtio-scsi multiqueue irq affinity

Liao,

On Mon, May 10 2021 at 11:19, liaochang wrote:
> 1.We have a machine with 36 CPUs,and assign several RT threads to last
> two CPUs(CPU-34, CPU-35).

Which kind of machine? x86?

> 2.I/O device driver create single managed irq, the affinity of which
> includes CPU-34 and CPU-35.

If that driver creates only a single managed interrupt, then the
possible affinity of that interrupt spawns CPUs 0 - 35.

That's expected, but what is the effective affinity of that interrupt?

# cat /proc/irq/$N/effective_affinity

Also please provide the full output of

# cat /proc/interrupts

and point out which device we are talking about.

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ