[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6786e4e-e1aa-e84d-3b08-509a90513077@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 19:50:19 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Vladimir Isaev <Vladimir.Isaev@...opsys.com>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rppt@...ux.ibm.com" <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARC: Use max_high_pfn as a HIGHMEM zone border
On 4/27/21 5:13 AM, Vladimir Isaev wrote:
> Commit 4af22ded0ecf ("arc: fix memory initialization for systems
> with two memory banks") fixed highmem, but for the PAE case it causes
> bug messages:
>
> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:80000
> page:(ptrval) refcount:0 mapcount:1 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x80000
> flags: 0x0()
> raw: 00000000 00000100 00000122 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> raw: 00000000
> page dumped because: nonzero mapcount
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-00003-g1e43c377a79f #1
>
> Stack Trace:
> arc_unwind_core+0xe8/0x118
> Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
>
> This is because the fix expects highmem to be always less than
> lowmem and uses min_low_pfn as an upper zone border for highmem.
>
> max_high_pfn should be ok for both highmem and highmem+PAE cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Isaev <isaev@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Applied to for-curr.
Thx,
-Vineet
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Revised commit message and added comment to code
> ---
> arch/arc/mm/init.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/init.c b/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> index ce07e697916c..1bcc6985b9a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,16 @@ void __init setup_arch_memory(void)
> min_high_pfn = PFN_DOWN(high_mem_start);
> max_high_pfn = PFN_DOWN(high_mem_start + high_mem_sz);
>
> - max_zone_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM] = min_low_pfn;
> + /*
> + * max_high_pfn should be ok here for both HIGHMEM and HIGHMEM+PAE.
> + * For HIGHMEM without PAE max_high_pfn should be less than
> + * min_low_pfn to guarantee that these two regions don't overlap.
> + * For PAE case highmem is greater than lowmem, so it is natural
> + * to use max_high_pfn.
> + *
> + * In both cases, holes should be handled by pfn_valid().
> + */
> + max_zone_pfn[ZONE_HIGHMEM] = max_high_pfn;
>
> high_memory = (void *)(min_high_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists