lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 12:10:07 +0200
From:   Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/thp: Make ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK dependent on
 PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 03:36:29PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/10/21 2:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:05:45AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> -	select ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK if X86_64 || X86_PAE
> >> +	select ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK if (PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2) && (X86_64 || X86_PAE)
> > 
> > It's still very early on a Monday, but IIRC this new condition is
> > identical to the pre-existing one.
> 
> Did not get it, could you please elaborate ?

When using x86_PAE, you must have more than two pgtable levels, right?
And not speaking of x86_64.

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ