linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 234/299] NFS: Dont discard pNFS layout segments that are marked for return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 12:20:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 234/299] NFS: Dont discard pNFS layout segments that are marked for return

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>

commit 39fd01863616964f009599e50ca5c6ea9ebf88d6 upstream.

If the pNFS layout segment is marked with the NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN
flag, then the assumption is that it has some reporting requirement
to perform through a layoutreturn (e.g. flexfiles layout stats or error
information).

Fixes: e0b7d420f72a ("pNFS: Don't discard layout segments that are marked for return")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -2470,6 +2470,9 @@ pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(struct p
 
 	assert_spin_locked(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
 
+	if (test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED, &lo->plh_flags))
+		tmp_list = &lo->plh_return_segs;
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, next, &lo->plh_segs, pls_list)
 		if (pnfs_match_lseg_recall(lseg, return_range, seq)) {
 			dprintk("%s: marking lseg %p iomode %d "
@@ -2477,6 +2480,8 @@ pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(struct p
 				lseg, lseg->pls_range.iomode,
 				lseg->pls_range.offset,
 				lseg->pls_range.length);
+			if (test_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN, &lseg->pls_flags))
+				tmp_list = &lo->plh_return_segs;
 			if (mark_lseg_invalid(lseg, tmp_list))
 				continue;
 			remaining++;