[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210511180951.GK7604@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 20:09:52 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: Re: next-20210511 - btrfs build failure on arm
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:08:02PM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> An arm allmodconfig build died with:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined!
>
> Some digging around with nm and looking at the assembler points at:
>
> @ /usr/src/linux-next/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2676: const int nr_bits = (end + 1 - start) / fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
> adds r1, r1, #1 @, tmp552,
> adc r0, r0, #0 @, tmp551,
> ldr r3, [r5, #1576] @ tmp2, _47->sectorsize_bits
> bl __aeabi_uldivmod @
>
> Introduced by this commit:
>
> commit 6512659d8f13015dccfb38a13c6d117d22572019
> Author: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
> Date: Mon May 3 10:08:55 2021 +0800
>
> btrfs: submit read time repair only for each corrupted sector
>
> Looks like that line could use something from include/linux/math.h
We got another report already, there's division instead of shift (a
mistake), so the expression would require u64/u32 division. The correct
one is (end + 1 - start) >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits; and will be fixed
in upcoming next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists