[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR01MB3816D1F9DC81BBB1FA5DF293F2539@BYAPR01MB3816.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 19:15:09 +0000
From: "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
CC: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
"Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/rdmavt: Decouple QP and SGE lists
allocations
> >
> > Why not kzalloc_node() here?
I agree here.
Other allocations that have been promoted to the core have lost the node attribute in the allocation.
For the rdmavt based drivers and especially with the QP, there are performance implications.
I have no issue moving the allocation, as long as the node centric allocation is preserved.
I will test the patch to make sure there is nothing else lurking.
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists