linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] srcu: Remove superfluous sdp->srcu_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210511230745.2894650-1-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 16:07:40 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] srcu: Remove superfluous sdp->srcu_lock_count zero filling

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>

Because alloc_percpu() zeroes out the allocated memory, there is no need
to zero-fill newly allocated per-CPU memory.  This commit therefore removes
the loop zeroing the ->srcu_lock_count and ->srcu_unlock_count arrays
from init_srcu_struct_nodes().  This is the only use of that function's
is_static parameter, which this commit also removes.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index e26547b34ad3..3414aff2a4b0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ do {									\
  * srcu_read_unlock() running against them.  So if the is_static parameter
  * is set, don't initialize ->srcu_lock_count[] and ->srcu_unlock_count[].
  */
-static void init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
+static void init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	int i;
@@ -148,14 +148,6 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
 		timer_setup(&sdp->delay_work, srcu_delay_timer, 0);
 		sdp->ssp = ssp;
 		sdp->grpmask = 1 << (cpu - sdp->mynode->grplo);
-		if (is_static)
-			continue;
-
-		/* Dynamically allocated, better be no srcu_read_locks()! */
-		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sdp->srcu_lock_count); i++) {
-			sdp->srcu_lock_count[i] = 0;
-			sdp->srcu_unlock_count[i] = 0;
-		}
 	}
 }
 
@@ -179,7 +171,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
 		ssp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data);
 	if (!ssp->sda)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp, is_static);
+	init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp);
 	ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = 0;
 	ssp->srcu_last_gp_end = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
 	smp_store_release(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed, 0); /* Init done. */
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23