linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] fs: unicode: Add utf8 module and a unicode layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 05:35:51 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>
Cc:     Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jaegeuk@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
        ebiggers@...gle.com, drosen@...gle.com, ebiggers@...nel.org,
        yuchao0@...wei.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
        andre.almeida@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] fs: unicode: Add utf8 module and a unicode layer

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:17:00AM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> Theodore / Christoph, since we haven't come up with any final decision with
> this discussion, how do you think we should proceed on this?

I think loading it as a firmware-like table is much preferable to
a module with all the static call magic papering over that it really is
just one specific table.