linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 11 (btrfs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 08:52:37 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 11 (btrfs)

Hi Randy,

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 7:13 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 5/10/21 8:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Changes since 20210510:
> >
>
> on i386:
>
> ld: fs/btrfs/extent_io.o: in function `btrfs_submit_read_repair':
> extent_io.c:(.text+0x624f): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'

I received a similar report from kisskb for m68k.

I assume the next version will fix this, cfr.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/751b7396-d0fd-d3b2-f14d-e730e6b08222@gmx.com/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds