[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tun91oaa.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 12:51:41 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] sched/idle: Move busy_cpu accounting to idle callback
On 06/05/21 22:15, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 8db40c8a6ad0..00e4669bb241 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, smt_id);
> #endif
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, is_idle);
This + patch 8 immediately reminds me of Aubrey's patch:
http://lore.kernel.org/r/1615872606-56087-1-git-send-email-aubrey.li@intel.com
last I looked it seemed OK, even the test bot seems happy. Aubrey, did you
have any more work to do on that one (other than rebasing)?
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing);
> @@ -673,6 +674,7 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> per_cpu(smt_id, cpu) = cpumask_first(cpu_smt_mask(cpu));
> #endif
> + per_cpu(is_idle, cpu) = 1;
> rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu), sds);
>
> sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_NUMA);
> --
> 2.18.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists