[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <188b3f52-05d7-7fe8-70e0-88009d7d70b8@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:10:40 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bp@...en8.de,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
fam.zheng@...edance.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v23 6/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap
pages associated with each HugeTLB page
On 5/10/21 5:19 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 6:45 PM Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:00:24AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> @@ -1376,6 +1376,39 @@ static void remove_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
>>> h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void add_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
>>> + bool adjust_surplus)
>>> +{
<snip>
>>
>> I think this function would benefit from some renaming. add_hugetlb_page() gives
>> me no hint of what is this about, although I can figure it out reading the code.
>
> Because I think it is the reverse operation of remove_hugetlb_page,
> I named it add_hugetlb_page. Do you have any suggestions for
> renaming?
>
FWIW, I am fine with the naming. As Muchun mentions, it is the opposite
of remove_hugetlb_page. At one time, I created a function with the same
name to be used by set_max_huge_pages and other routines which add pages
to the hugetlb pool. It would be much more obvious than the current
code path in which we call put_page which calls the hugetlb destructor
free_huge_page to add the page to the pool.
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists