[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210511131422.GA31783@86ca4a2db576>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:14:22 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Robert Yang <decatf@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: [RFC PATCH] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: kx0231025_regs can be static
drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c:224:30: warning: symbol 'kx0231025_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index 5aa2a1cb2309d..1e5e241f2bcdf 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ const struct kx_chipset_regs kxtf9_regs = {
};
/* The registers have totally different names but the bits are compatible */
-const struct kx_chipset_regs kx0231025_regs = {
+static const struct kx_chipset_regs kx0231025_regs = {
.int_src1 = KX023_REG_INS2,
.int_src2 = KX023_REG_INS3,
.int_rel = KX023_REG_INT_REL,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists