[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJqI3Vixcqr+jyZX@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:38:37 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: Switch the order of arguments to copy_linear_skb
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 01:11:42PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Matthew Wilcox
> > Sent: 11 May 2021 12:34
> >
> > All other skb functions use (off, len); this is the only one which
> > uses (len, off). Make it consistent.
>
> I wouldn't change the order of the arguments without some other
> change that ensures old code fails to compile.
> (Like tweaking the function name.)
Yes, some random essentially internal function that has had no new
users since it was created in 2017 should get a new name *eyeroll*.
Please find more useful things to critique. Or, you know, write some
damned code yourself instead of just having opinions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists