[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f0530bc9b974951ae0bb1e2beb02422@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:12:06 +0000
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"mjg59@...gle.com" <mjg59@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 03/11] evm: Refuse EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES only if an
HMAC key is loaded
> From: Mimi Zohar [mailto:zohar@...ux.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 3:42 PM
> On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 13:29 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is an EVM initialization flag that can be
> set to
> > temporarily disable metadata verification until all xattrs/attrs necessary
> > to verify an EVM portable signature are copied to the file. This flag is
> > cleared when EVM is initialized with an HMAC key, to avoid that the HMAC is
> > calculated on unverified xattrs/attrs.
> >
> > Currently EVM unnecessarily denies setting this flag if EVM is initialized
> > with a public key, which is not a concern as it cannot be used to trust
> > xattrs/attrs updates. This patch removes this limitation.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.16.x
> > Fixes: ae1ba1676b88e ("EVM: Allow userland to permit modification of EVM-
> protected metadata")
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>
> Once the comments below are addressed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/evm | 5 +++--
> > security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 5 ++---
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> > index 3c477ba48a31..eb6d70fd6fa2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm
> > @@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ Description:
> > modification of EVM-protected metadata and
> > disable all further modification of policy
> >
> > - Note that once a key has been loaded, it will no longer be
> > - possible to enable metadata modification.
> > + Note that once an HMAC key has been loaded, it will no longer
> > + be possible to enable metadata modification and, if it is
> > + already enabled, it will be disabled.
>
> It's worth mentioning that echo'ing a new value is additive. Once EVM
> metadata modification is enabled, the only way of disabling it is by
> enabling an HMAC key. It's also worth mentioning that metadata writes
> are only permitted once further changes to the EVM policy are disabled.
If I'm not wrong, it is not required to set EVM_SETUP_COMPLETE to allow
metadata writes. I think the original idea was to boot a system in a way
that portable signatures can be written, and then to enable enforcement.
Roberto
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli
> Perhaps the best way of explaining this is by including a new example -
> echo 6> <securityfs>/evm.
>
> >
> > Until key loading has been signaled EVM can not create
> > or validate the 'security.evm' xattr, but returns
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> > index bbc85637e18b..860c48b9a0c3 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
> > @@ -81,11 +81,10 @@ static ssize_t evm_write_key(struct file *file, const
> char __user *buf,
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > /* Don't allow a request to freshly enable metadata writes if
> > - * keys are loaded.
> > + * an HMAC key is loaded.
> > */
>
> Please drop the word "freshly". While updating the comment, please
> move the sentence starting with "Don't" to a new line.
>
> > if ((i & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES) &&
> > - ((evm_initialized & EVM_KEY_MASK) != 0) &&
> > - !(evm_initialized & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES))
> > + (evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) != 0)
> > return -EPERM;
> >
> > if (i & EVM_INIT_HMAC) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists