[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210511145529.GN1336@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 15:55:29 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Abbott Liu <liuwenliang@...wei.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Enlarge IO_SPACE_LIMIT needed for some SoC
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:51:15PM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:46:49PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > OK, so the entire second host bridge fails to probe, because there is
> > no virtual address space left for the I/O window.
> >
> > Just change the 'downstream I/O' window size in the DT to 64k
> > (0x10000) - I assume the current size (0x100000) is a typo anyway.
>
> Ok, so my fear were right... someone just typo the IO when the dtsi was
> pushed and was wrong from all that times. Much easier and cleaner
> solution.
Great news.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists