[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01b0e007-6af6-ca2e-2a0d-7ff4ca2a2927@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 08:52:42 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 16/32] x86/tdx: Handle MWAIT, MONITOR and WBINVD
> The 'default' case in this 'switch' prints the exit reason and faults,
> can't that also trigger a backtrace that dumps the exception stack and
> the faulting instruction? In other words shouldn't this just fail with
> a common way to provide better debug on any unhandled #VE and not try
> to continue running past something that "can't" happen?
It will use the #GP common code which will do all the backtracing etc.
We didn't think we would need anything else than what #GP already does.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists