linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 371/530] ASoC: wm8960: Remove bitclk relax condition in wm8960_configure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210512144831.973693687@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 16:48:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 371/530] ASoC: wm8960: Remove bitclk relax condition in wm8960_configure_sysclk

From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>

[ Upstream commit 99067c07e8d877035f6249d194a317c78b7d052d ]

The call sequence in wm8960_configure_clocking is

   ret = wm8960_configure_sysclk();
   if (ret >= 0)
        goto configure_clock;

   ....

   ret = wm8960_configure_pll();

configure_clock:
   ...

wm8960_configure_sysclk is called before wm8960_configure_pll, as
there is bitclk relax on both functions, so wm8960_configure_sysclk
always return success, then wm8960_configure_pll() never be called.

With this case:
aplay -Dhw:0,0 -d 5 -r 48000 -f S24_LE -c 2 audio48k24b2c.wav
the required bitclk is 48000 * 24 * 2 = 2304000, bitclk got from
wm8960_configure_sysclk is 3072000, but if go to wm8960_configure_pll.
it can get correct bitclk 2304000.

So bitclk relax condition should be removed in wm8960_configure_sysclk,
then wm8960_configure_pll can be called, and there is also bitclk relax
function in wm8960_configure_pll.

Fixes: 3c01b9ee2ab9 ("ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation")
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1614740862-30196-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 12 +-----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
index ceaf3bbb18e6..9d325555e219 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
@@ -608,10 +608,6 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = {
  *		- lrclk      = sysclk / dac_divs
  *		- 10 * bclk  = sysclk / bclk_divs
  *
- *	If we cannot find an exact match for (sysclk, lrclk, bclk)
- *	triplet, we relax the bclk such that bclk is chosen as the
- *	closest available frequency greater than expected bclk.
- *
  * @wm8960: codec private data
  * @mclk: MCLK used to derive sysclk
  * @sysclk_idx: sysclk_divs index for found sysclk
@@ -629,7 +625,7 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 {
 	int sysclk, bclk, lrclk;
 	int i, j, k;
-	int diff, closest = mclk;
+	int diff;
 
 	/* marker for no match */
 	*bclk_idx = -1;
@@ -653,12 +649,6 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int mclk,
 					*bclk_idx = k;
 					break;
 				}
-				if (diff > 0 && closest > diff) {
-					*sysclk_idx = i;
-					*dac_idx = j;
-					*bclk_idx = k;
-					closest = diff;
-				}
 			}
 			if (k != ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs))
 				break;
-- 
2.30.2