linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.11 101/601] KVM: SVM: Use online_vcpus, not created

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 16:42:58 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 101/601] KVM: SVM: Use online_vcpus, not created_vcpus, to iterate over vCPUs

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

commit c36b16d29f3af5f32fc1b2a3401bf48f71cabee1 upstream.

Use the kvm_for_each_vcpu() helper to iterate over vCPUs when encrypting
VMSAs for SEV, which effectively switches to use online_vcpus instead of
created_vcpus.  This fixes a possible null-pointer dereference as
created_vcpus does not guarantee a vCPU exists, since it is updated at
the very beginning of KVM_CREATE_VCPU.  created_vcpus exists to allow the
bulk of vCPU creation to run in parallel, while still correctly
restricting the max number of max vCPUs.

Fixes: ad73109ae7ec ("KVM: SVM: Provide support to launch and run an SEV-ES guest")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Message-Id: <20210331031936.2495277-2-seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ static int sev_launch_update_vmsa(struct
 {
 	struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
 	struct sev_data_launch_update_vmsa *vmsa;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	int i, ret;
 
 	if (!sev_es_guest(kvm))
@@ -572,8 +573,8 @@ static int sev_launch_update_vmsa(struct
 	if (!vmsa)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < kvm->created_vcpus; i++) {
-		struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(kvm->vcpus[i]);
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+		struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 
 		/* Perform some pre-encryption checks against the VMSA */
 		ret = sev_es_sync_vmsa(svm);