linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.11 185/601] regulator: bd9576: Fix return from bd957x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 16:44:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 185/601] regulator: bd9576: Fix return from bd957x_probe()

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit 320fcd6bbd2b500923db518902c2c640242d2b50 ]

The probe() function returns an uninitialized variable in the success
path.  There is no need for the "err" variable at all, just delete it.

Fixes: b014e9fae7e7 ("regulator: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YEsbfLJfEWtnRpoU@mwanda
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
index a8b5832a5a1b..204a2da054f5 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/bd9576-regulator.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static int bd957x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct regmap *regmap;
 	struct regulator_config config = { 0 };
-	int i, err;
+	int i;
 	bool vout_mode, ddr_sel;
 	const struct bd957x_regulator_data *reg_data = &bd9576_regulators[0];
 	unsigned int num_reg_data = ARRAY_SIZE(bd9576_regulators);
@@ -279,8 +279,7 @@ static int bd957x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		break;
 	default:
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported chip type\n");
-		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto err;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	config.dev = pdev->dev.parent;
@@ -300,8 +299,7 @@ static int bd957x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 				"failed to register %s regulator\n",
 				desc->name);
-			err = PTR_ERR(rdev);
-			goto err;
+			return PTR_ERR(rdev);
 		}
 		/*
 		 * Clear the VOUT1 GPIO setting - rest of the regulators do not
@@ -310,8 +308,7 @@ static int bd957x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		config.ena_gpiod = NULL;
 	}
 
-err:
-	return err;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static const struct platform_device_id bd957x_pmic_id[] = {
-- 
2.30.2