lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJt0nI8lG+2juL5S@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 08:24:28 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tong Zhang <ztong0001@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] misc: alcor_pci: fix null-ptr-deref when there is no
 PCI bridge

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 05:29:38PM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote:
> Device might be attached to root complex directly. In this case,
> bus->self(bridge) will be NULL, so we'd better check before use it
> 
> [    1.246492] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c0
> [    1.248731] RIP: 0010:pci_read_config_byte+0x5/0x40
> [    1.253998] Call Trace:
> [    1.254131]  ? alcor_pci_find_cap_offset.isra.0+0x3a/0x100 [alcor_pci]
> [    1.254476]  alcor_pci_probe+0x169/0x2d5 [alcor_pci]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@...il.com>
> Co-Developed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> v2: check before calling alcor_pci_find_cap_offset()
> 
>  drivers/misc/cardreader/alcor_pci.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cardreader/alcor_pci.c b/drivers/misc/cardreader/alcor_pci.c
> index cd402c89189e..175c6b06f7aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cardreader/alcor_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cardreader/alcor_pci.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ static void alcor_pci_init_check_aspm(struct alcor_pci_priv *priv)
>  	u32 val32;
>  
>  	priv->pdev_cap_off    = alcor_pci_find_cap_offset(priv, priv->pdev);
> +
> +	if (!priv->parent_pdev)
> +		return;

That feels wrong, you just prevented all of the remaining logic in this
call to not be set up.  Did you test this and did the driver and device
still work properly if it hits this check?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ