[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f15674a0a6544d8c90522cc8938e3eb6@mikrotik.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:53:37 +0300
From: Gatis Peisenieks <gatis@...rotik.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: chris.snook@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
hkallweit1@...il.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
dchickles@...vell.com, tully@...rotik.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] atl1c: improve performance by avoiding
unnecessary pcie writes on xmit
On 2021-05-12 00:39, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> @@ -2270,8 +2272,11 @@ static netdev_tx_t atl1c_xmit_frame(struct
>> sk_buff *skb,
>> atl1c_tx_rollback(adapter, tpd, type);
>> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> } else {
>> - netdev_sent_queue(adapter->netdev, skb->len);
>> - atl1c_tx_queue(adapter, skb, tpd, type);
>> + bool more = netdev_xmit_more();
>> +
>> + __netdev_sent_queue(adapter->netdev, skb->len, more);
>
>
> This is probably buggy.
>
> You must check and use the return code of this function,
> as in :
>
> bool door_bell = __netdev_sent_queue(adapter->netdev, skb->len,
> netdev_xmit_more());
>
> if (door_bell)
> atl1c_tx_queue(adapter, type);
>
Eric, thank you for taking your time to look at this!
You are correct, tx queue can get stopped in __netdev_sent_queue
and if there were more packets coming the submit to HW would be
missed / unnecessarily delayed.
>
>> + if (!more)
>> + atl1c_tx_queue(adapter, type);
>> }
>>
>> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists