[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210512182747.3445812-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:27:44 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rcu-tasks: Add block comment laying out RCU Tasks design
This commit adds a block comment that gives a high-level overview of how
RCU tasks grace periods progress. It also adds a note about how exiting
tasks are handled, plus it gives an overview of the memory ordering.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 350ebf5051f9..94d2c2c7f0ab 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -377,6 +377,46 @@ static void rcu_tasks_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
// Finally, this implementation does not support high call_rcu_tasks()
// rates from multiple CPUs. If this is required, per-CPU callback lists
// will be needed.
+//
+// The implementation uses rcu_tasks_wait_gp(), which relies on function
+// pointers in the rcu_tasks structure. The rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread()
+// function sets these function pointers up so that rcu_tasks_wait_gp()
+// invokes these functions in this order:
+//
+// rcu_tasks_pregp_step():
+// Invokes synchronize_rcu() in order to wait for all in-flight
+// t->on_rq and t->nvcsw transitions to complete. This works because
+// all such transitions are carried out with interrupts disabled.
+// rcu_tasks_pertask(), invoked on every non-idle task:
+// For every runnable non-idle task other than the current one, use
+// get_task_struct() to pin down that task, snapshot that task's
+// number of voluntary context switches, and add that task to the
+// holdout list.
+// rcu_tasks_postscan():
+// Invoke synchronize_srcu() to ensure that all tasks that were
+// in the process of exiting (and which thus might not know to
+// synchronize with this RCU Tasks grace period) have completed
+// exiting.
+// check_all_holdout_tasks(), repeatedly until holdout list is empty:
+// Scans the holdout list, attempting to identify a quiescent state
+// for each task on the list. If there is a quiescent state, the
+// corresponding task is removed from the holdout list.
+// rcu_tasks_postgp():
+// Invokes synchronize_rcu() in order to ensure that all prior
+// t->on_rq and t->nvcsw transitions are seen by all CPUs and tasks
+// to have happened before the end of this RCU Tasks grace period.
+// Again, this works because all such transitions are carried out
+// with interrupts disabled.
+//
+// For each exiting task, the exit_tasks_rcu_start() and
+// exit_tasks_rcu_finish() functions begin and end, respectively, the SRCU
+// read-side critical sections waited for by rcu_tasks_postscan().
+//
+// Pre-grace-period update-side code is ordered before the grace via the
+// ->cbs_lock and the smp_mb__after_spinlock(). Pre-grace-period read-side
+// code is ordered before the grace period via synchronize_rcu() call
+// in rcu_tasks_pregp_step() and by the scheduler's locks and interrupt
+// disabling.
/* Pre-grace-period preparation. */
static void rcu_tasks_pregp_step(void)
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists