linux-kernel - [PATCH] Staging: vchiq_arm: Using pr_err and pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210512184440.550116-1-phind.uet@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 02:44:40 +0800
From:   Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
To:     nsaenz@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
        stefan.wahren@...e.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        phil@...pberrypi.com, amarjargal16@...il.com
Cc:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Staging: vchiq_arm: Using pr_err and pr_notice instead of printk

This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning:
fix Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_info([subsystem]dev, ... then
dev_info(dev, ... then pr_info(...  to printk(KERN_INFO ...

Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@...il.com>
---
 .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c   | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
index 1b1356833b8f..ee759cb786b0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
@@ -2192,10 +2192,10 @@ vchiq_get_state(void)
 {
 
 	if (!g_state.remote)
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: g_state.remote == NULL\n", __func__);
+		pr_err("%s: g_state.remote == NULL\n", __func__);
 	else if (g_state.remote->initialised != 1)
-		printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: g_state.remote->initialised != 1 (%d)\n",
-			__func__, g_state.remote->initialised);
+		pr_notice("%s: g_state.remote->initialised != 1 (%d)\n",
+			  __func__, g_state.remote->initialised);
 
 	return (g_state.remote &&
 		(g_state.remote->initialised == 1)) ? &g_state : NULL;
-- 
2.25.1