[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJufDcQ5l/yz4MF1@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:25:33 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@...esys.com>,
Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] serial: fsl_lpuart: don't restore interrupt state in
ISR
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:01:43PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Since commit 81e2073c175b ("genirq: Disable interrupts for force
> threaded handlers") interrupt handlers that are not explicitly requested
> as threaded are always called with interrupts disabled and there is no
> need to save the interrupt state when taking the port lock.
Since you've copied the above words verbatim from commit 75f4e830fa9c
("serial: do not restore interrupt state in sysrq helper") I'd expect
you to use quotes or at least refer to the commit you copied the
rationale from.
> This is a preparation for sysrq handling which uses
> uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq();
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists