linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2 v2] x86/cpu: Init AP exception handling from cpu_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 11:52:50 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2 v2] x86/cpu: Init AP exception handling from cpu_init_secondary()

On Wed, May 12 2021 at 10:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:29:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> +void cpu_init_secondary(void)
>> +{
> 	/*
> 	 * Relies on the BP having set-up the IDT tables, which
> 	 * are loaded on this CPU in the below
> 	 * cpu_init_exception_handling().
> 	 */
>> +	cpu_init_exception_handling();
>> +	cpu_init();
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> Or something along those lines? It took me a little to figure out why
> start_secondary() didn't have idt_setup_traps(), hopefully something
> like this will avoid a little future confusion.

I'll add something to that effect.