linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] serial: fsl_lpuart: handle break and make sysrq work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJu5ktQT1eziDpaI@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 13:18:42 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@...esys.com>,
        Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] serial: fsl_lpuart: handle break and make sysrq work

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:31:33PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> [dropped fugang.duan@....com, mail bounces with 550 5.4.1 Recipient
> address rejected: Access denied]
> 
> Am 2021-05-12 12:07, schrieb Johan Hovold:

> > But you should get rid of the sysrq trylock hack when switching to
> > uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq().
> 
> Ok. But only for the sport->port.sysrq part right? We'll still
> need it for oops_in_progress.

Right.

Johan