[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210512141435.GL1333995@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 07:14:35 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc: "wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] watchdog: imx2_wdt: clear WDOG_HW_RUNNING before
suspend
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:34:37AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
> On 2021/05/11 11:59 Guenter Roeck <groeck7@...il.com> wrote:
> > On 5/11/21 4:20 AM, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > Since watchdog_ping_work is not freezable so that it maybe scheduled
> > > before imx2_wdt_resume where watchdog clock enabled, hence, kernel
> > > will hang in imx2_wdt_ping without clock, and then watchdog reset
> > > happen. Prevent the above case by clearing WDOG_HW_RUNNING before
> > > suspend, and restore it with ping in imx2_wdt_resume.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c
> > > index b84f80f..d3751e9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c
> > > @@ -357,6 +357,13 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> > imx2_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > */
> > > __imx2_wdt_set_timeout(wdog, IMX2_WDT_MAX_TIME);
> > > imx2_wdt_ping(wdog);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * clear WDOG_HW_RUNNING to prevent watchdog_ping_work
> > running
> > > + * before imx2_wdt_resume where clock enabled, otherwise kernel
> > > + * will hang and watchdog reset happen then.
> > > + */
> > > + clear_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdog->status);
> > > }
> > >
> > > clk_disable_unprepare(wdev->clk);
> > > @@ -386,6 +393,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused imx2_wdt_resume(struct
> > device *dev)
> > > if (imx2_wdt_is_running(wdev)) {
> > > imx2_wdt_set_timeout(wdog, wdog->timeout);
> > > imx2_wdt_ping(wdog);
> > > + set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdog->status);
> > > }
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > I really don't like this; it depends on assumptions how the watchdog core
> > works, and it misuses WDOG_HW_RUNNING to indicate that the clock is
> > stopped (or that the driver is in suspend mode).
> >
> > If ping doesn't work with the clock stopped, I think it would be much better to
> > have a flag indicating that the clock is stopped, and have the ping function do
> > nothing if it is called with stopped clock (ie if suspended).
> >
> Understood, but I think that corner case should be a common potential issue
> in all watchdog drivers which disable clock in suspend with WDOG_HW_RUNNING.
> So common way looks better than many different specific flags in such different
> watchdog driver with the similar intention?
>
We can not assume that the situation is exactly the same for all drivers
and use a core flag to indicate some driver specific state just to avoid
a driver-internal flag.
Either case, it looks like you are saying that the watchdog can be stopped
after all, by disabling its clock.
> BTW, for i.mx2_wdt which watchdog can't be stop unless kernel enter into suspend,
> that seems like watchdog stop after suspend and clear WDOG_HW_RUNNING makes
> sense?
>
Yes, if you make it official and add a stop function which disables the watchdog
by stopping its clock. Then the driver should not set WDOG_HW_RUNNING in the
first place, and use the normal mechanisms to start and stop the watchdog.
That would include starting the clock in the start function, and stopping it
in the stop function.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists