[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2501f556-1326-f09c-baa2-464057ea100c@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 00:15:58 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...eaurora.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/33] locking/atomic: m68k: move to ARCH_ATOMIC
Hi Mark, Geert,
On 11/5/21 8:27 pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> CC Greg
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:00 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:27:45AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:42 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>>>> We'd like all architectures to convert to ARCH_ATOMIC, as once all
>>>> architectures are converted it will be possible to make significant
>>>> cleanups to the atomics headers, and this will make it much easier to
>>>> generically enable atomic functionality (e.g. debug logic in the
>>>> instrumented wrappers).
>>>>
>>>> As a step towards that, this patch migrates m68k to ARCH_ATOMIC. The
>>>> arch code provides arch_{atomic,atomic64,xchg,cmpxchg}*(), and common
>>>> code wraps these with optional instrumentation to provide the regular
>>>> functions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>>
>>> I even gave this series a spin on ARAnyM and QEMU, and everything
>>> seems to be fine.
>>
>> Thanks! That's much appreciated; I was able to build-test, but didn't
>> have a suitable setup for boot testing.
>>
>> The Kbuild test robot noticed I broke one configuration by renaming
>> atomic_dec_and_test_lt(), since it's not part of the common atomic API,
>> and is used in get_mmu_context() in <asm/mmu_context.h>.
>
> Ah, that's in the part for Coldfire, so I (and my builds) didn't notice.
>
>> On the primciple of keeping the common atomic API separate from
>> arch-specific bits, I've kept the `arch_` prefix and updated the caller.
>> Does that sound good to you?
>
> That's fine for me, but as this is Coldfire, I'd like to defer to Greg.
Looks fine to me too.
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
Regards
Greg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists