[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJvmp3ELvej0ydnL@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:31:03 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
hpa@...or.com, tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v2 02/20] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB
version
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:03:41AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Version 2 of the spec adds bunch of NAEs, and several of them are
> optional except the hyervisor features NAE. IMO, a guest should bump the
> GHCB version only after it has implemented all the required NAEs from
> the version 2. It may help during the git bisect of the guest kernel --
> mainly when the hypervisor supports the higher version.
Aha, so AFAICT, the version bump should happen in patch 3 which adds
that HV features NAE - not in a separate one after that. The logic
being, with the patch which adds the functionality needed, you mark the
guest as supporting v2.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists