[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210512143855.GB19594@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:38:56 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND2] ptrace: make ptrace() fail if the tracee changed
its pid unexpectedly
Hi Mathieu,
On 05/12, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity: what makes it OK to use either the current task or its
> parent's pid namespace in this specific case ? What happens if they are
> in different pid namespaces ?
Because in this case current == task->parent == debugger.
Just in case... task->real_parent is, well, "real parent", the parent which
forked this task.
task->parent == task->real_parent unless this task is ptraced, in this case
task->parent == debugger.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists