[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPBb6MUKtxCS=JbtBmvwwEovrN8NCtLmMGcTkozo_gnDMRsqHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:05:02 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Cc: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/15] media: mtk-vcodec: vdec: add media device if
using stateless api
Hi Hans, thanks for the review!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:28 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl> wrote:
>
> On 27/04/2021 13:15, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > From: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>
> >
> > The stateless API requires a media device for issuing requests. Add one
> > if we are being instantiated as a stateless decoder.
>
> Why for the stateless decoder only? Why not create one for all?
>
> It's not a blocker, but I would recommend looking at this.
Would there be any use in creating a media device for a stateful
decoder that does not need to use requests?
Cheers,
Alex.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists