[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210513082236.GD2734@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 10:22:36 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Chi Wu <wuchi.zero@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...com, hcochran@...nelspring.com,
jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mszeredi@...hat.com, sedat.dilek@...il.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page-writeback: Use __this_cpu_inc() in
account_page_dirtied()
On Wed 12-05-21 22:47:42, Chi Wu wrote:
> As account_page_dirtied() was always protected by xa_lock_irqsave(),
> so using __this_cpu_inc() is better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chi Wu <wuchi.zero@...il.com>
Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 0062d5c57d41..e3901d0d329e 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -2436,7 +2436,7 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping)
> inc_wb_stat(wb, WB_DIRTIED);
> task_io_account_write(PAGE_SIZE);
> current->nr_dirtied++;
> - this_cpu_inc(bdp_ratelimits);
> + __this_cpu_inc(bdp_ratelimits);
>
> mem_cgroup_track_foreign_dirty(page, wb);
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists