linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9fe46899-2162-e9e2-d15c-86db38ac820f@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 14:05:35 +0200
From:   "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation

On 13.05.2021 01:58, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
> 
> Grr, this entire series got autobinned into my spam folder, which I obviously
> don't check very often.  I won't be able to take a look until next week at the
> earliest, any chance you'd want to rebase to the latest kvm/queue and spin v3?
> The rebase will probably be a bit painful, but on the plus side the majority of
> the arch specific changes will disappear now that walking the memslots for the
> MMU notifiers is done in common code.

A respin (and a re-test) of this series is needed anyway since these
patches have conflicts with the now-merged MMU notifiers rewrite (that you
mention above).

Will try to post it by the next week.

Thanks,
Maciej