linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and allocation APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210513135030.GF1002214@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 10:50:30 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Cc:     Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and
 allocation APIs

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:07:07PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 01:39:02PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 02:28:53PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > 
> > > This is a good feature in general when let's say there is a linux supported
> > > device which has a proprietary device firmware update tool which only exists
> > > as an x86 binary and your hardware is not x86 - running qemu + vfio in full
> > > emulation would provide a way to run the tool to update a physical device.
> > 
> > That specific use case doesn't really need a vIOMMU though, does it?
> 
> Possibly not, but the mechanics needed to do vIOMMU on different host
> IOMMU aren't really different from what you need for a no-vIOMMU
> guest.  

For very simple vIOMMUs this might be true, but this new features of nesting
PASID, migration, etc, etc all make the vIOMMU complicated and
emuluating it completely alot harder.

Stuffing a vfio-pci into a guest and creating a physical map using a
single IOASID is comparably trivial.

Jason