lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 10:35:00 +0800
From:   "fanghao (A)" <fanghao11@...wei.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC:     <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reset: hi6220: Use the correct HiSilicon copyright



On 2021/5/12 14:19, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 14:50 +0800, Hao Fang wrote:
>> s/Hisilicon/HiSilicon/g.
>> It should use capital S, according to
>> https://www.hisilicon.com/en/terms-of-use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Fang <fanghao11@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c b/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c
>> index 1992650..5ca145b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c
>> +++ b/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>   * Hisilicon Hi6220 reset controller driver
>
> Why leave this "Hisilicon" alone?

HiSilicon has applied for two trademarks Hisilicon/HiSilicon, so I think this one is OK. But there is only one English name for the company,
We have consulted with company's lawyer who suggested that should use a copyright statement consistent with the official website.

>
>>   *
>>   * Copyright (c) 2016 Linaro Limited.
>> - * Copyright (c) 2015-2016 Hisilicon Limited.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2015-2016 HiSilicon Limited.
>>   *
>>   * Author: Feng Chen <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>
>>   */
>
> That will be a lot of churn:
>
>   git grep Copyright.*Hisilicon | wc -l
>   141
>
>   git grep Hisilicon | wc -l
>   371

As mentioned above, I am focused on correcting the copyright.
5.13-rc1 has been released and I will continue to clean the rest by make one patch per subsystem.

Should I resend this based on 5.13-rc1?

>
> Could I get an Acked-by from someone at HiSilicon for this?

Maybe I could remind the author.

>
> regards
> Philipp
>
> .
>

Thank,
Hao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ