lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6ed9349-1a9a-62a9-521f-a12ec8c4a5a5@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:17 -0700
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, maxz@...inx.com,
        sonal.santan@...inx.com, yliu@...inx.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        stefanos@...inx.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, mdf@...nel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, Max Zhen <max.zhen@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 XRT Alveo 08/20] fpga: xrt: driver infrastructure


On 5/11/21 6:53 PM, Lizhi Hou wrote:
> Infrastructure code providing APIs for managing leaf driver instance
> groups, facilitating inter-leaf driver calls and root calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Max Zhen <max.zhen@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>

> +
> +int xrt_subdev_root_request(struct xrt_device *self, u32 cmd, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = DEV(self);
> +	struct xrt_subdev_platdata *pdata = DEV_PDATA(self);
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!pdata->xsp_root_cb);
> +	return (*pdata->xsp_root_cb)(dev->parent, pdata->xsp_root_cb_arg, cmd, arg);

I am running v6 through clang's static analyzer.

It reports this problem

drivers/fpga/xrt/lib/subdev.c:72:9: warning: Called function pointer is 
null (null dereference)
         return (*pdata->xsp_root_cb)(dev->parent, 
pdata->xsp_root_cb_arg, cmd, arg);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Though there is a warn_on, can you also add a

return -EINVAL;

To cover this case?

Tom

> +}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ