linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio:adc:ad7766: Fix unnecessary check in ad7766

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210513170334.479953d3@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 17:03:34 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, knaack.h@....de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:adc:ad7766: Fix unnecessary check in ad7766_probe()

On Tue, 11 May 2021 21:47:39 +0800
Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:

> In the function ad7766_probe(), the return value of
> devm_iio_device_register() can be zero or ret, Thus it
> is unnecessary to repeated check here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>

Hi Tang Bin,

A quick query on this sign off sequence as I'd like to check what the
intended meaning is.

If you both developed this patch, please use the Co-developed-by: tag
to indicate that.   If Zhang Shengju wrote the patch then you sent it
upstream, please fix the 'from' field on the email to reflect that.

Patch itself is good.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
> index b6b6765be..acf56e987 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
> @@ -291,10 +291,7 @@ static int ad7766_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -	return 0;
> +	return devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct spi_device_id ad7766_id[] = {