linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/69] "Revert and fix properly" patch series based on umn.edu re-review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJ1a8qo4xfi8Bpcz@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 18:59:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/69] "Revert and fix properly" patch series based on
 umn.edu re-review

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 01:56:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> [individuals put on bcc: due to quantity would have been rejected by vger]
> 
> Here is the "final" set of reverts and fixes based on the re-review of
> all accepted umn.edu commits.  It consists of 7 "clean" reverts that do
> not need to be fixed up again for various reasons (see the commit
> messages for reasoning), and then 31 sets of "revert & fix" commits that
> consist of reverting the offending commit and then fixing it up
> properly.
> 
> Where these patches were accepted into stable kernels, I've properly
> tagged them for reverting in the stable kernels automatically as well.
> 
> I'll be taking these through one of my trees, so there's no need for any
> maintainer to have to worry about these needing to go through theirs.

These are now merged (minus the ones people asked me to drop) to my
char-misc tree.

thanks,

greg k-h