linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] mm/thp: Update mm's MM_ANONPAGES stat in set_huge_zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 09:59:34 -0700
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/thp: Update mm's MM_ANONPAGES stat in set_huge_zero_page()

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:50 AM Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:20 AM Anshuman Khandual
> <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
> >
> > Although the zero huge page is being shared across various processes, each
> > mapping needs to update its mm's MM_ANONPAGES stat by HPAGE_PMD_NR in order
> > to be consistent. This just updates the stats in set_huge_zero_page() after
> > the mapping gets created.
>
> I don't get why MM_ANONPAGES needs to be inc'ed when huge zero page is
> installed. This may cause inconsistency between some counters, for
> example, MM_ANONPAGES may be much bigger than anon LRU.
>
> MM_ANONPAGES should not be inc'ed unless a new page is allocated and
> installed, right?

I just realized I mixed MM_ANONPAGES up with the global anon pages
counter. Take back my comment. Sorry for the confusion.

>
> >
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> > Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> > ---
> > Should it update MM_SHMEM_PAGES instead ? Applies on latest mainline.
> >
> >  mm/huge_memory.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 63ed6b25deaa..262703304807 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ static void set_huge_zero_page(pgtable_t pgtable, struct mm_struct *mm,
> >         if (pgtable)
> >                 pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmd, pgtable);
> >         set_pmd_at(mm, haddr, pmd, entry);
> > +       add_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> >         mm_inc_nr_ptes(mm);
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
> >