| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210513165846.23722-6-mcroce@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 18:58:46 +0200
From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@...lsio.com>,
Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mirko Lindner <mlindner@...vell.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>,
Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sven Auhagen <sven.auhagen@...eatech.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] mvneta: recycle buffers
From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
Use the new recycling API for page_pool.
In a drop rate test, the packet rate increased di 10%,
from 269 Kpps to 296 Kpps.
perf top on a stock system shows:
Overhead Shared Object Symbol
21.78% [kernel] [k] __pi___inval_dcache_area
21.66% [mvneta] [k] mvneta_rx_swbm
7.00% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
6.05% [kernel] [k] eth_type_trans
4.44% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_free.part.0
3.80% [kernel] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
3.68% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive
3.65% [kernel] [k] get_page_from_freelist
3.43% [kernel] [k] page_pool_release_page
3.35% [kernel] [k] free_unref_page
And this is the same output with recycling enabled:
Overhead Shared Object Symbol
24.10% [kernel] [k] __pi___inval_dcache_area
23.02% [mvneta] [k] mvneta_rx_swbm
7.19% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
6.50% [kernel] [k] eth_type_trans
4.93% [kernel] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
4.77% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_free.part.0
3.93% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive
3.03% [kernel] [k] build_skb
2.91% [kernel] [k] page_pool_put_page
2.85% [kernel] [k] __xdp_return
The test was done with mausezahn on the TX side with 64 byte raw
ethernet frames.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 7d5cd9bc6c99..6d2f8dce4900 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp,
}
static struct sk_buff *
-mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq,
+mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct page_pool *pool,
struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 desc_status)
{
struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);
@@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq,
if (!skb)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- page_pool_release_page(rxq->page_pool, virt_to_page(xdp->data));
+ skb_mark_for_recycle(skb, virt_to_page(xdp->data), pool);
skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start);
skb_put(skb, xdp->data_end - xdp->data);
@@ -2343,7 +2343,10 @@ mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq,
skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags,
skb_frag_page(frag), skb_frag_off(frag),
skb_frag_size(frag), PAGE_SIZE);
- page_pool_release_page(rxq->page_pool, skb_frag_page(frag));
+ /* We don't need to reset pp_recycle here. It's already set, so
+ * just mark fragments for recycling.
+ */
+ page_pool_store_mem_info(skb_frag_page(frag), pool);
}
return skb;
@@ -2425,7 +2428,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct napi_struct *napi,
mvneta_run_xdp(pp, rxq, xdp_prog, &xdp_buf, frame_sz, &ps))
goto next;
- skb = mvneta_swbm_build_skb(pp, rxq, &xdp_buf, desc_status);
+ skb = mvneta_swbm_build_skb(pp, pp, &xdp_buf, desc_status);
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
struct mvneta_pcpu_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(pp->stats);
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists