[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a4e9702-5407-aa95-be9b-864775bbaabd@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:33:14 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 10/32] x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls
On 5/13/21 12:29 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> If there isn't, then the way we do it is adding another (invisible)
>> Kconfig variable to express the dependency for tdx-kvm.o:
>>
>> config INTEL_TDX_GUEST_KVM
>> bool
>> depends on KVM_GUEST && INTEL_TDX_GUEST
>
> Currently it will only be used for KVM hypercall code. Will it to be
> overkill to create a new config over #ifdefs for this use case ? But,
> if this is the preferred approach, I will go with this suggestion.
You'll see this done lots of different (valid) ways over the kernel.
(#ifdef'd #including C files is not one of them.)
*My* preference is to use Kconfig in the way I described. It keeps
makefiles and #ifdef's clean and obvious, relegating the logic to Kconfig.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists